Programmable Value

Welcome to Bitesize Payments: Digital. I’m Paul Thomalla.

The expanded Substack version is here :-

https://bitesizepayments.substack.com/p/programmable-value

Imagine a banknote that could decide whether you’re allowed to spend it.

Or a coin that automatically splits itself when certain conditions are met.

Or money that flows continuously from your account without you touching it, based on rules it’s executing.

 Money that acts. Money with agency. Money that doesn’t just sit there waiting for you to use it—but executes its own instructions. 

This sounds deeply strange. Unsettling, even.

Payments Industry Insights

History of Payments

Payment System Explained

Corporate Payments Strategy

Payment Regulations Impact

ISO20022 Standard

Digital Payments Evolution

CBDC Advancements

Cryptocurrency in Payments

Financial Technology Education

Transcript

BITESIZE PAYMENTS: DIGITAL

Episode 4: Programmable Value

Transcript

OPENING

Welcome to Bitesize Payments: Digital. I’m Paul Thomalla.

Imagine a banknote that could decide whether you’re allowed to spend it.

Or a coin that automatically splits itself when certain conditions are met.

Or money that flows continuously from your account without you touching it, based on rules it’s executing.

Money that acts. Money with agency. Money that doesn’t just sit there waiting for you to use it — but executes its own instructions.

This sounds deeply strange. Unsettling, even.

For thousands of years, money was a tool. A thing you used. Coins didn’t do anything on their own. Notes just sat in your wallet. Gold bars stayed in vaults until someone moved them. Money was passive. Inert. It had no logic, no rules, no ability to act independently.

You controlled what happened to your money. You picked it up. You handed it over. You decided when and where it moved.

But what if money could decide for itself?

Not you deciding to pay someone. The money itself, following programmed instructions, executing automatically based on conditions.

A coin that can only be spent on groceries, never alcohol. A payment that releases only when work is verified. Money that streams continuously per second of service delivered, stopping the instant service stops.

Money with rules embedded in it. Money that enforces those rules without asking your permission.

This is programmable money. And it’s fundamentally different from anything that came before.

SECTION 1: WHY WE’D WANT MONEY TO HAVE RULES

Sometimes the problem with money is that you have too much control.

You want to save, but you can’t resist spending. You want to honour a commitment, but you might change your mind. You want someone else to trust you’ll pay, but they don’t know if you will.

Sometimes you want constraints you can’t override.

Escrow without the middleman.

You’re buying a house. You need to pay the seller, but only when the title transfers to you. If the seller doesn’t deliver the title, you want your money back. If you get the title, the seller should get paid.

Right now, you need an escrow company. A third party who holds the money, verifies the conditions are met, and releases payment. They charge fees for this service. And you have to trust them to do it honestly.

What if the money itself could enforce that rule?

“Pay seller if title transfers. Otherwise, return to buyer.”

The money executes that logic automatically. No escrow company needed. No middleman taking fees. The terms are visible to everyone in advance. Nobody can cheat because the money won’t allow it.

Trust without trusting.

You’re hiring a contractor to renovate your kitchen. They want payment upfront. You want to pay only after the work is done. Neither of you fully trusts the other.

Right now, you need contracts, potential lawyers, the threat of lawsuits. It’s expensive and adversarial.

What if the money had instructions embedded: “Release payment if work is verified complete”?

The contractor knows they’ll get paid when they finish. You know you won’t pay until work is done. The money itself enforces the deal. Both parties can verify the terms in advance. Trust isn’t required.

Automation you can’t override.

You want to save five hundred pounds per month. But you’re bad at it. Every month, something comes up, and you convince yourself to skip it this once.

Right now, you can set up a standing order. But you can also cancel it. Your future self can override your current self’s good intentions.

What if the money itself enforced the rule? Automatically splits your paycheck. Sends five hundred pounds to savings before you see it. You literally can’t override it even when you want to.

The pattern is the same: you deliberately constrain yourself because the constraint is useful. The ability to change your mind, to override, to stay in control — that’s sometimes the problem, not the solution.

You want money that enforces rules you might otherwise break.

And once you accept that principle, the possibilities go much further.

You’re on holiday and your flight gets cancelled. Right now, you file a claim, wait weeks, chase the airline. With programmable money, the insurance pays out the moment the cancellation is confirmed. No form, no phone call, no waiting. The money knew the conditions and it acted.

Or take the corporate side. A manufacturer ships goods to a retailer in another country. Right now, that triggers weeks of paperwork — letters of credit, trade finance, multiple banks verifying documents. With programmable money, payment releases automatically when the shipping container clears customs. One event triggers the next: customs clearance releases payment, payment triggers the supplier’s invoice, the supplier’s invoice triggers their raw materials order. A chain of transactions that used to need five intermediaries, executing itself.

And here’s the thing: programmable money isn’t actually as alien as it first seems.

We already use money with rules. Direct debits. Standing orders. Automatic savings transfers. Recurring subscriptions. Mortgage payments that happen on the 1st whether you remember or not.

You’ve programmed rules for your money: “Pay X pounds on the Yth of every month.” And mostly, you let those rules execute without thinking about it.

The difference is: right now, intermediaries enforce those rules. You tell your bank “pay my mortgage on the 1st.” The bank executes that instruction. If something goes wrong, you call the bank. There’s a human system you can appeal to.

Programmable money removes the middleman. The money itself has the instruction embedded. No bank needed to enforce it. The code executes automatically. The rules are in the money itself.

Because when the bank enforces the rule, you can call and ask them to stop. You can dispute it. There’s human judgement in the loop.

When the money enforces the rule through code, there might not be anyone to call. The code just executes. Automatically. Exactly as programmed.

Which is both the promise and the terror.

SECTION 2: THE NIGHTMARE SCENARIO

Now let’s acknowledge the fear that’s been sitting in the back of your mind this whole time.

If money can execute its own rules… who writes those rules?

What if a hacker embeds instructions you didn’t agree to, draining your account continuously? What if a company hides conditions in fine print that trigger payments you never intended? What if malicious code makes money flow somewhere you didn’t authorise? What if you realise what’s happening but can’t stop it because the code is executing automatically?

This isn’t paranoia. It’s a legitimate risk.

And here’s the deeper problem: most people don’t understand code. You might agree to terms you don’t fully comprehend. You might not realise what you’re authorising until it’s too late.

The tension is fundamental. You want automation — direct debits are convenient. You want rules you can’t override — savings you can’t raid. You want to remove intermediaries — escrow fees are expensive. But you also need protection from mistakes, from malicious actors, from changed circumstances where you urgently need to stop a payment but can’t.

How do you get the benefits of programmable money without losing protection from bad actors and bad code?

That’s the question we don’t have a good answer to yet. Because the same feature that makes programmable money useful — automatic execution without intermediaries — is also what makes it dangerous.

WHEN YOU BECOME A SPECTATOR

There’s something even deeper going on here. Something more subtle but possibly more profound.

The more money becomes programmable and autonomous, the less you interact with it directly.

Today, you’re in the loop. You check your bank balance. You decide to pay bills. You authorise transactions. You move money deliberately. You’re an active participant in what your money does.

But tomorrow? Your money flows automatically based on rules you set. Smart contracts execute without asking permission. Your devices pay for services continuously. Micro-payments stream in the background. Money moves constantly, mostly without you seeing it.

You set the rules once. Then the money just… does its thing.

You become disconnected from your own money.

Not disconnected in the sense of not owning it. Disconnected in the sense of not being involved in what it’s doing.

For all of human history, money required human action. You had to pick up the coin. Hand over the note. Approve the payment. Sign the cheque. Enter your PIN. Confirm the transaction. You were essential to money moving.

But with programmable money, you might set rules once and then… the money operates autonomously. Transactions happen constantly. Payments flow continuously. Contracts execute automatically based on conditions you programmed weeks or months ago and possibly forgot about.

You check your balance and see it’s lower than it was this morning. Why? Because seventeen different automated payments executed. Your car paid for parking. Your home paid for electricity. Your subscriptions renewed. Your savings plan deducted. Your insurance premium processed. Three smart contracts reached their conditions and released funds.

You’re not managing your money anymore. You’re just watching it happen.

Is this liberation? You don’t have to think about every transaction. You don’t have to remember to pay bills. You don’t have to manually execute your financial commitments. Your money manages itself based on rules you’ve established.

Or is it alienation? You’re no longer actively engaged with your economic activity. Money flows around you and through you, but you’re not really… involved. You’re spectating your own financial life.

What’s your relationship to money when you’re not actually using it anymore?

When it’s just operating autonomously in the background, executing rules, transacting continuously without your involvement?

When “your money” becomes less something you control and more something that happens to be associated with you?

This might be the deepest shift of all. Not just that money can execute logic. But that money becomes so automated, so active, so constantly operating…

That you become peripheral to your own wealth.

SECTION 3: THE QUESTIONS WE’RE LEFT WITH

So here we are.

We’ve seen that money can be programmed, that it can execute its own instructions, that it can enforce rules automatically without intermediaries. We’ve explored why we might want this and acknowledged we already do versions of it through banks and standing orders. We’ve seen what becomes possible and confronted what becomes dangerous. And we’ve realised that the more autonomous money becomes, the more disconnected we become from it.

The questions that follow are uncomfortable. When money executes its own logic, who’s responsible when things go wrong? If code is law, and the code makes a mistake, who do you blame? Who fixes it? We want the benefits of self-executing money, but we need safeguards against bad actors and bugs — and nobody has figured out how to build systems that are both fully automatic and fully safe.

Then there’s the question of human judgement. Right now, humans interpret contracts, consider circumstances, exercise discretion. When code is the contract — exact and unambiguous — where does judgement fit? And can people even understand what they’re agreeing to when the rules are programmed instructions most people can’t read?

We don’t have good answers yet. But the questions are urgent.

Because programmable money isn’t theoretical anymore. Smart contracts exist. Automated payments are everywhere. The shift from passive money to active money is already happening.

And once money can execute logic, once it can operate autonomously, once it becomes active rather than passive…

Everything else changes too.

OUTRO

Next time on Bitesize Payments: Digital — Episode 5: The New Settlement Reality. When money can also settle instantly, globally, atomically… and you’re already disconnected from understanding what it’s doing… where are we?

If this changed how you think about something, I’d love to hear what. And if you know someone who’d push back on it, send it to them too. I’m Paul Thomalla. Thanks for listening.